extraiorew.blogg.se

Elysian exploit runner
Elysian exploit runner






elysian exploit runner

Since Storm Troopers are an equivalent but inherently better option than the Core choice, players will tend to take a minimum of Core choices and maxing the support companies.

elysian exploit runner

My issue with leaving the air-cav elements unchanged for now is that it will fundamentally affect the balance amongst other elements in the list.Ĭurrently, Support Companies are essentially the best options in the list. I respect your desire to try and iron out some of the kinks with the new, relatively untested units before fine-tuning some of the older elements. Any imbalances will reveal themselves and be duplicatable.and corrected. Documented playtesting is the key determinant in what changes get made. But, it also produces more consistent results.Īnd as always, my old rule still stands. The fact that I am using this methodology shouldn't come as a surprise to you E&C, it's what was used to drive the Tau development.

#Elysian exploit runner software#

It's a standard methodology in software testing. In addition, I am a big proponent of not changing too many variables at one time. They aren't critical to proving whether or not the other elements work with the DTCs. Now, will the Valk/Vendie costs get worked out? Absolutely. If planning on dropping a formation into cover as a dedicated objective holder, for instance, Valkyries aren't particularly necessary. Second, it's still extra points to bring the carriers, and they aren't always desired. Sure, this isn't game-imposed, but it does represent the sort of scarcity the Elysians tend to deal with. First, people need physical models to represent the Valks, and there tends to be a finite limit of the expensive things. In actually play, I think there are two factors that will contribute to your looked-for scarcity of Valkyries, without removing them altogether. Whatever happened to Battalions?) to deploy entirely via Valkyries which remain on station. I highly doubt anyone's epic game will be that big, but maybe we should limit Drop Companies to allow only 40 of them to take Valkyries? I think that it's unnecessary to build that kind of restriction into the list, especially since it's entirely possible for an Elysian Brigade (which is their apparent designation for a group of Companies which make up a Regiment. Although only half of the 23rd Regiment was able to deploy at once, that half was delivered with 160 Valkyries. Both IA books detailing the Elysians depict an entire regimental assault. The reason why the Elysians tend to deploy in two waves in the fluff has less to do with a deliberate regimental organization decision, and more to do with the sheer size of the deployments in question. So, the list has to work as a drop infantry list first. That seems to be an accepted fact associated with their operations.

elysian exploit runner

In each case so far, there have been two waves of drops to get everyone where they need to be.

elysian exploit runner

From a fluff perspective, in both IA books, it is very clear that the Elysians deploy with not enough Valkyrie transports to drop all of their forces. the 101st Airborne Regiment mounted in Hueys. It is critical that those elements are balanced as this is primarily geared to be a "drop" infantry list vs. However, it is very important to the overall direction of the list that the DTCs in association with the additional support elements are balanced first. Is everything perfect at this point? Absolutely not and I have stated so.








Elysian exploit runner